Frame-based Stereotactic Biopsy Research Articles

Stereotactic frame-based biopsy of infratentorial lesions via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach with the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system—a retrospective analysis of 79 consecutive cases

ObjectiveLesions of the posterior fossa (brainstem and cerebellum) are challenging in diagnosis and treatment due to the fact that they are often located eloquently and total resection is rarely possible. Therefore, frame-based stereotactic biopsies are commonly used to asservate tissue for neuropathological diagnosis and further treatment determination. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and diagnostic success rate of frame-based stereotactic biopsies for lesions in the posterior fossa via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach.MethodsWe performed a retrospective database analysis of all frame-based stereotactic biopsy cases at our institution since 2007. The aim was to identify all surgical cases for infratentorial lesion biopsies via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach. We collected clinical data regarding outcomes, complications, diagnostic success, radiological appearances, and stereotactic trajectories.ResultsA total of n = 79 cases of stereotactic biopsies for posterior fossa lesions via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach (41 female and 38 male) utilizing the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system were identified. The mean age at the time of surgery was 42.5 years (± 23.3; range, 1–87 years). All patients were operated with intraoperative stereotactic imaging (n = 62 MRI, n = 17 CT). The absolute diagnostic success rate was 87.3%. The most common diagnoses were glioma, lymphoma, and inflammatory disease. The overall complication rate was 8.7% (seven cases). All patients with complications showed new neurological deficits; of those, three were permanent. Hemorrhage was detected in five of the cases having complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.6%, and 1-year survival rate was 70%.ConclusionsOur data suggests that frame-based stereotactic biopsies with the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach are safe and reliable for infratentorial lesions bearing a high diagnostic yield and an acceptable complication rate. Further research should focus on the planning of safe trajectories and a careful case selection with the goal of minimizing complications and maximizing diagnostic success.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of surgical treatment in children with brainstem tumor.

Brainstem tumors present a significant challenge in surgical treatment, and the prognostic factors in children are lacking. This study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of surgical treatment in children with brainstem tumors. 50 children with brainstem tumors who underwent surgical treatment, including frameless- or frame-based stereotactic biopsy and resection, were included and followed up for clinical and biological analysis. Factors of outcomes were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. 27 cases (54.0%) underwent resection in all children with brainstem tumors. The rate of resection reached as high as 81.8% in children with non-diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), while in children with DIPG, biopsy was performed in the majority, and resection was obtained in the minority with focal necrosis. A rare complication was found following the surgery. Multivariate analysis considered World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4, with hazard ratio (HR)=4.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.84-8.69, p=0.001, H3K27M mutation (HR=2.50, 95% CI 1.73-5.69, p=0.015), and hydrocephalus (HR=2.17, 95% CI 1.08-5.32, p=0.014) as independent adverse prognostic factors. For Kaplan-Meier analysis, children with WHO grade 3-4, Ki-67 LI ≥ 20%, TP53 mutation, H3K27M mutation, DIPG, and hydrocephalus had significantly decreased overall survival (OS). A high rate of resection has been obtained in non-DIPG, and surgical intervention is remarkably safe and efficient for children with brainstem tumors. WHO grade 3-4, H3K27M mutation, and hydrocephalus indicate poor prognosis in children with brainstem tumors.

The molecular diagnostic yield of frame-based stereotactic biopsies in the age of precision neuro-oncology: a cross-sectional study

PurposeWith the increasing role of molecular genetics in the diagnostics of intracranial tumors, delivering sufficient representative tissue for such analyses is of paramount importance. This study explored the rate of successful diagnosis after frame-based stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing frame-based stereotactic biopsies in 2020 and 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Cases were classified into three groups: conclusive, diagnosis with missing molecular genetics (MG) data, and inconclusive neuropathological diagnosis.ResultsOf 145 patients, a conclusive diagnosis was possible in n = 137 cases (94.5%). For 3 cases (2.0%), diagnosis was established with missing MG data. In 5 cases (3.5%), an inconclusive (tumor) diagnosis was met. Diagnoses comprised mainly WHO 4 glioblastomas (n = 73, 56%), CNS lymphomas (n = 23, 16%), inflammatory diseases (n = 14, 10%), and metastases (n = 5, 3%). Methylomics were applied in 49% (n = 44) of tumor cases (panel sequencing in n = 28, 30% of tumors). The average number of specimens used for MG diagnostics was 5, while the average number of specimens provided was 15. In a univariate analysis, insufficient DNA was associated with an inconclusive diagnosis or a diagnosis with missing MG data (p < 0.001). Analyses of planned and implemented trajectories of cases with diagnosis with missing MG data or inconclusive diagnosis (n = 8) revealed that regions of interest were reached in almost all cases (n = 7).ConclusionAlthough stereotactic frame-based biopsies deliver a limited amount of tissue, they bear high histopathological and molecular genetic diagnostic yields. Given the proven surgical precision of the planned biopsy trajectories, optimizing surveyed lesion regions could help improve the rate of conclusive diagnoses.

Navigation Guided Biopsy Is as Effective as Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy.

Stereotactic biopsy is a standard procedure for brain biopsy. However, with advances in technology, navigation-guided brain biopsy has become a well-established alternative. Previous studies have shown that frameless stereotactic brain biopsy is as effective and safe as frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy is. In this study, the authors evaluate the diagnostic yield and complication rate of frameless intracranial biopsy. We reviewed data from biopsy performed patients between March 2014 and April 2022. We retrospectively reviewed medical records, including imaging studies. Various intracerebral lesions were biopsied. Diagnostic yield and post-operative complications were compared with those of frame-based stereotactic biopsy. Forty-two frameless navigation-guided biopsy were performed, and the most common pathology was primary central nervous system lymphoma (35.7%), followed by glioblastoma (33.3%), and anaplastic astrocytomas (16.7%), respectively. The diagnostic yield was 100%. Post-operative intracerebral hematoma occurred in 2.4% of cases, but it was not symptomatic. Thirty patients underwent frame-based stereotactic biopsy, and the diagnostic yield was 96.7%. There was no difference in diagnostic rates between two methods (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.916). Frameless navigation-guided biopsy is as effective as frame-based stereotactic biopsy is, without causing further complications. We consider that frame-based stereotactic biopsy is no longer needed if frameless navigation-guided biopsy is used. A further study will be needed to generalize our results.

A Comparison of the Safety, Efficacy, and Accuracy of Frame-Based versus Remebot Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Systems for Biopsy of Brainstem Tumors

Brainstem tumors are rare and extremely heterogeneous and present significant challenges in surgical treatment. Thus, biopsies often set the foundation for the diagnosis of brainstem tumors. Multimodal, image-guided, robot-assisted frameless stereotactic biopsies are increasingly popular in neurosurgery centers. This study aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and duration of the Remebot robot-assisted (Remebot) frameless brainstem tumor biopsy versus those of frame-based stereotactic biopsy. A retrospective analysis of 33 patients with brainstem tumors who underwent stereotactic brainstem biopsies in the department of neurosurgery from January 2016 to January 2021 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: the Remebot group (n = 22) and the frame-based group (n = 11). The clinical characteristics, trajectory strategy, duration of procedure, diagnostic yielding, histopathological diagnosis, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the groups. More pediatric patients performed Remebot frameless brainstem tumor biopsy than frame-based biopsy, with a mean age of 17.3 ± 18.7 vs. 32.8 ± 17.1 (p = 0.027). The diagnostic yield had no significant difference in the two groups, with the diagnostic yield of frame-based biopsy and Remebot frameless brain biopsy being 90.9% and 95.5%, respectively. The time of the total process was 124.5 min for the frame-based biopsy and 84.7 min for the Remebot frameless brain biopsy (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences with respect to the occurrence of complication or the duration of the operation between the two groups. Remebot frameless stereotactic brainstem biopsy is as safe and efficacious as frame-based stereotactic biopsy. However, Remebot frameless biopsy can reduce the total duration of the procedure and has better application in young pediatric patients. Remebot frameless stereotactic biopsies can be a better option towards the safe and efficient treatment of brainstem tumors.

Stereotactic biopsy for multiple intra-axial brain lesions: impact on consequent treatment Regimen

Background and objectivesMultiple brain lesions represent a serious challenge in which biopsy is commonly the first step to help overcome patients' mental anxiety and decide the following treatment step. This study presents an effective decisional algorithm that could guide in dealing with such a challenge. We evaluate the feasibility and safety of frame-based stereotactic biopsy to obtain the histopathologic diagnosis of the multiple intra-axial brain lesions and to decide the further treatment.Patients and methodsThirty-two patients with multiple intracerebral lesions underwent stereotactic serial biopsies for brain lesions at the Neurosurgery Department, Tanta University Hospital. All the stereotactic biopsies were obtained under local anesthesia using Riechert–Mundinger (RM) system or Cosman–Roberts–Wells (CRW) system.ResultsThe histopathological diagnosis revealed multifocal malignant gliomas in 43.75% of patients (18.75% anaplastic astrocytoma and 25% multiform glioblastoma) and metastatic tumor in 37.5% of patients (all were adenocarcinoma). In addition, 12.5% had multiple brain abscesses, and 6.25% had malignant lymphoma. We reported no mortality secondary to the surgical procedure.ConclusionsStereotactic biopsy is considered the best choice to allow histopathologic diagnosis of multiple brain lesions with minimal morbidity and no mortality. Histopathologic findings gained with stereotactic procedures guided the choice of proper treatment thus eliminating the hazards associated with blind treatments.

The value of stereotactic biopsy of primary and recurrent brain metastases in the era of precision medicine.

Brain metastases (BM) represent the most frequent intracranial tumors with increasing incidence. Many primary tumors are currently treated in protocols that incorporate targeted therapies either upfront or for progressive metastatic disease. Hence, molecular markers are gaining increasing importance in the diagnostic framework of BM. In cases with diagnostic uncertainty, both in newly diagnosed or recurrent BM, stereotactic biopsy serves as an alternative to microsurgical resection particularly whenever resection is not deemed to be safe or feasible. This retrospective study aimed to analyze both diagnostic yield and safety of an image-guided frame based stereotactic biopsy technique (STX). Our institutional neurosurgical data base was searched for any surgical procedure for suspected brain metastases between January 2016 and March 2021. Of these, only patients with STX were included. Clinical parameters, procedural complications, and tissue histology and concomitant molecular signature were assessed. Overall, 467 patients were identified including 234 (50%) with STX. Median age at biopsy was 64 years (range 29 - 87 years). MRI was used for frame-based trajectory planning in every case with additional PET-guidance in 38 cases (16%). In total, serial tumor probes provided a definite diagnosis in 230 procedures (98%). In 4 cases (1.7%), the pathological tissue did not allow a definitive neuropathological diagnosis. 24 cases had to be excluded due to non-metastatic histology, leaving 206 cases for further analyses. 114 patients (49%) exhibited newly diagnosed BM, while 46 patients (20%) displayed progressive BM. Pseudoprogression was seen in 46 patients, a median of 12 months after prior therapy. Pseudoprogression was always confirmed by clinical course. Metastatic tissue was found most frequently from lung cancer (40%), followed by breast cancer (9%), and malignant melanoma (7%). Other entities included gastrointestinal cancer, squamous cell cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and thyroid cancer, respectively. In 9 cases (4%), the tumor origin could not be identified (cancer of unknown primary). Molecular genetic analyses were successful in 137 out of 144 analyzed cases (95%). Additional next-generation sequencing revealed conclusive results in 12/18 (67%) cases. Relevant peri-procedural complications were observed in 5 cases (2.4%), which were all transient. No permanent morbidity or mortality was noted. In patients with BM, frame-based stereotactic biopsy constitutes a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield. Importantly, this extended to discerning pseudoprogression from tumor relapse after prior therapy. Thus, comprehensive molecular characterization based on minimal-invasive stereotactic biopsies lays the foundation for precision medicine approaches in the treatment of primary and recurrent BM.

A delayed radiation-induced necrotic lesion in the brainstem mimicking tumor recurrence confirmed by stereotactic biopsy: a case report and literature review

It is important to differentiate radiation necrosis (RN) from tumor recurrence because these conditions require different treatments. Despite the use of various imaging techniques, this distinction remains difficult due to the high heterogeneity of brain tissue. Stereotactic biopsy is still considered the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis of RN despite its invasiveness. However, if the location of the lesion is in the brainstem, stereotactic biopsy is very difficult to even for skillful surgeons. We herein report a case of a 24-year-old male with a history of medulloblastoma at the age of 5, who presented with distinct gait disturbance and dysarthria at a regular visit. The initial radiological diagnosis of a brain mass was recurrent medulloblastoma. Considering the initial diagnosis, additional radiotherapy was considered. Nevertheless, the chance of the mass being RN could not be eliminated. Despite the high risk due to the location of the lesion, a frame-based stereotactic biopsy was performed. The pathological diagnosis after the biopsy confirmed the lesion as RN. This case illustrates the importance of stereotactic biopsy in differentiating between tumor recurrence and RN, even when the location of the lesion makes it challenging.

A New Noninvasive Frameless Registration System for Stereotactic Cranial Biopsy: A Technical Note.

Although frame-based stereotactic biopsy is still considered the gold standard for brain biopsies, frameless robot-assisted stereotactic systems are now able to provide an equal level of safety and accuracy. However, both systems suffer from a lack of efficiency of the operative workflow. To describe the technique of a new frameless and noninvasive registration tool Neurolocate (Renishaw). This tool, combined with an intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography imaging system like O-ARM (Medtronic), might facilitate the achievement and workflow of robot-assisted stereotactic intracranial biopsies. Neurolocate is a 3-dimensional fiducial tool fixed directly on the Neuromate (Renishaw) robot arm. It consists of 5 radio-opaque spherical fiducials, whose geometry is constant. This tool made it possible to carry out the coregistration then the biopsy in the same operating time, following a five-step procedure described here. We retrospectively extracted selected preliminary results from our initial experience. Over 1 year, 23 consecutive adult patients were biopsied with Neurolocate in our center. The mean overall operative time, from patient's installation to skin closure, was 97 minutes ± 27 (SD). The entire procedure took place in a single location unit (operating room), which facilitated workflow and surgical planning. No invasive gesture was performed outside of the operating time. Neurolocate is a new frameless and noninvasive registration tool that could improve workflow and flexibility for operating room management and surgical planning. It may also increase the comfort of patients undergoing robot-assisted intracranial stereotactic biopsies. The accuracy and safety profile should be addressed in specific studies.

P07.12.B Brain Biopsy with Optical Guidance

Abstract Background Accurate stereotactic biopsies of brain tumors are imperative for diagnosis and decisions on therapy. Repetitive needle insertions owing to inconclusive tissue samples enhance increased risks of brain lesioning, hemorrhage and prolonged procedure. Previously we reported on frame-based stereotactic biopsies with a combined 5-ALA fluorescence and laser Doppler flowmetry detection system[1]. The system has now been adapted to frameless navigation with a modified biopsy needle and a new registration system[2]. Material and Methods Planning was effected with the Medtronic Stealth System. The optical probe was inserted inside the outer cannula of the biopsy needle, which had an opening at the tip, enabling optical measurements ahead of the needle in real-time while manually forwarding it along the trajectory to the target. Fluorescence spectra, microvascular blood flow, and tissue grayness were recorded during insertion. The biopsies were taken where the fluorescence indicated tumor tissue; the optical probe was replaced by the inner cannula. The diagnoses were compared with the fluorescence signals. Results In the 9 examined patients the fluorescence measurements and pathological diagnosis of high-grade gliomas or lymphomas matched. Only one needle insertion was necessary. The optical measurements along the trajectory took 5-10 min to the target, the pathological diagnosis was reported after 30-70 min. The probe provided direct feedback of increased blood flow along the trajectory and of malignant tissue in the vicinity of the target. Conclusion The optical probe can detect tumor before any tissue is retrieved. If fluorescence is registered, pathological tissue is safely identified. The method can increase the precision and safety of the biopsy and shorten the procedure. The new multimodal probe and the improved registration unit will be tested with other stereotactic and navigation systems and at other neurosurgical centers. Also, the parallel project on fluorescence guided resection of high-grade gliomas is continued[3].

P11.73.B The diagnostic value of frame-based stereotactic biopsies in the age of precision oncology: A cross-sectional study

Abstract Background For non-resectable, eloquent, multifocal and deep-seated intracranial lesions, stereotactic frame-based biopsies can deliver a finite amount of tissue for neuropathology studies. With the increasing role of molecular genetics in the diagnostics of intracranial tumors, sufficient tissue for sequencing studies is of paramount importance. This study explored the rate of successful diagnosis after stereotactic frame-based biopsies of intracranial lesions in a high-throughput neurooncology center Material and Methods 145 consecutive patients undergoing frame-based stereotactic biopsies in 2020 and 2021 at our neurosurgical department were included in this retrospective analysis. Aspects of histological and molecular (methylomics, panel-sequencing) neuropathology analysis in addition to clinical and radiological variables were analyzed. Cases were classified as conclusive, likely-conclusive (sufficient diagnosis with non-satisfying sequencing information), and inconclusive neuropathological diagnosis. Results Of 145 cases analyzed, astrocytic tumors were suspected in n= 94 (67%) of patients. In n= 122 cases (84%), a conclusive diagnosis was possible. For 14 (11%) cases, a likely-conclusive diagnosis was established Diagnoses comprised mainly WHO 4 glioblastomas (56%), WHO 3 gliomas (2%) in addition to WHO 1 and 2 gliomas (n=7, 5%), CNS lymphomas (n=23, 16%), inflammatory diseases (n=10, 7%) and normal or reactive tissue (n=4, 3%). Methylomics were pivotal in providing an integrated diagnosis in 30% of the cases (panel sequencing in 14%). In n= 12 (8%) of the cases further testing was hindered by insufficient tissue sample DNA. Only in 3 out of 12 cases this resulted in a final inconclusive diagnosis. Conclusion Although stereotactic frame-based biopsies deliver a limited amount of tissue, they bear an excellent histopathological and molecular genetic diagnostic yield, with rare cases of missing molecular data or rarely insufficient diagnosis. Optimizing the number and representativeness of cell and DNA-rich stereotactic biopsy specimen might enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of precision oncology even further.

A Comparation Between Frame-Based and Robot-Assisted in Stereotactic Biopsy.

IntroductionFrame-based stereotactic biopsy is well-established to play an essential role in neurosurgery. In recent years, different robotic devices have been introduced in neurosurgery centers. This study aimed to compare the SINO surgical robot-assisted frameless brain biopsy with standard frame-based stereotactic biopsy in terms of efficacy, accuracy and complications.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 151 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy at Chongqing Sanbo Jiangling Hospital between August 2017 and December 2021. All patients were divided into the frame-based group (n = 47) and the SINO surgical robot-assisted group (n = 104). The data collected included clinical characteristics, diagnostic yield, operation times, accuracy, and postoperative complications.ResultsThere was no significant difference in diagnostic yield between the frame-based group and the SINO surgical robot-assisted group (95.74 vs. 98.08%, p > 0.05). The mean operation time in the SINO surgical robot-assisted group was significantly shorter than in the frame-based group (29.36 ± 13.64 vs. 50.57 ± 41.08 min). The entry point error in the frame-based group was significantly higher than in the robot-assisted group [1.33 ± 0.40 mm (0.47–2.30) vs. 0.92 ± 0.27 mm (0.35–1.65), P < 0.001]. The target point error in the frame-based group was also significantly higher than in the robot-assisted group [1.63 ± 0.41 mm (0.74–2.65) vs. 1.10 ± 0.30 mm (0.69–2.03), P < 0.001]. Finally, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups.ConclusionRobot-assisted brain biopsy becomes an increasingly mainstream tool in the neurosurgical procedure. The SINO surgical robot-assisted platform is as efficient, accurate and safe as standard frame-based stereotactic biopsy and provides a reasonable alternative to stereotactic biopsy in neurosurgery.

Correlation of Tumor Pathology with Fluorescein Uptake and MRI Contrast-Enhancement in Stereotactic Biopsies.

The utilization of fluorescein-guided biopsies has recently been discussed to improve and expedite operative techniques in the detection of tumor-positive tissue, as well as to avoid making sampling errors. In this study, we aimed to report our experience with fluorescein-guided biopsies and elucidate distribution patterns in different histopathological diagnoses in order to develop strategies to increase the efficiency and accuracy of this technique. We report on 45 fluorescence-guided stereotactic biopsies in 44 patients (15 female, 29 male) at our institution from March 2016 to March 2021, including 25 frame-based stereotactic biopsies and 20 frameless image-guided biopsies using VarioGuide®. A total number of 347 biopsy samples with a median of 8 samples (range: 4–18) per patient were evaluated for intraoperative fluorescein uptake and correlated to definitive histopathology. The median age at surgery was 63 years (range: 18–87). Of the acquired specimens, 63% were fluorescein positive. Final histopathology included glioblastoma (n = 16), B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), astrocytoma, IDH-mutant WHO grade III (n = 6), astrocytoma, IDH-mutant WHO grade II (n = 1), oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted WHO grade II (n = 2), reactive CNS tissue/inflammation (n = 4), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD; n = 2), ependymoma (n = 1), infection (toxoplasmosis; n = 1), multiple sclerosis (n = 1), and metastasis (n = 1). The sensitivity for high-grade gliomas was 85%, and the specificity was 70%. For contrast-enhancing lesions, the specificity of fluorescein was 84%. The number needed to sample for contrast-enhancing lesions was three, and the overall number needed to sample for final histopathological diagnosis was five. Interestingly, in the astrocytoma, IDH-mutant WHO grade III group, 22/46 (48%) demonstrated fluorescein uptake despite no evidence for gadolinium uptake, and 73% of these were tumor-positive. In our patient series, fluorescein-guided stereotactic biopsy increases the likelihood of definitive neuropathological diagnosis, and the number needed to sample can be reduced by 50% in contrast-enhancing lesions.

Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy - A Single Neurosurgeon Experience of 604 Diagnostic Procedures and Literature Review.

Frame-based stereotactic biopsy (SB) is essential in managing patients with suspected intracranial lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical experience of the senior neurosurgeon to define the lesion, radiology, and technique-related factors that affect the diagnostic yield and complications, along with the literature review. Documents were examined for consecutively performed frame-based SBs from 1999 to 2021. Procedures that are aimed at nondiagnostic purposes were excluded, thus leaving 604 diagnostic procedures. Diagnostic yield, complication rates, and their relationship with clinical variables were investigated. The diagnostic yield was 98%, with a symptomatic hemorrhage rate of 1.2%, a total morbidity rate of 4.8%, and a mortality rate of 0.83%. Larger tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 1.350), experienced neurosurgeon (OR = 1.339), and pathologist (OR = 462.743), and prebiopsy examination with both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (OR = 27.062) were associated with an increased diagnostic yield. None of the parameters were statistically significant for nonhemorrhagic morbidity, whereas the increasing number of specimens (OR = 1.395) and glial tumors (OR = 3.740) were associated with an increased hemorrhagic risk. Likewise, the increasing number of specimens (OR = 2.497) along with the increasing age (OR = 14.098) were associated with increased mortality risk. Knowledge of stereotactic techniques and meticulous surgical planning is required to enhance the diagnostic yield and safety of SB. Considering the results of this largest, MRI-guided, single-neurosurgeon SB series, we advocate training neurosurgeons on stereotactic techniques, routine use of intraoperative pathological examination, and working with dedicated neuropathologists when possible.

Optimized Intraoperative Imaging for Stereotactic Planning with a Multiaxial Robotic C-arm System: Technical Note and Case Series.

The preoperative preparation of the planning dataset for frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy is often associated with logistical effort and burden on the patient. Intraoperative imaging modalities need to be investigated to overcome these limitations. The objective of the study was to develop and apply a new method for the intraoperative acquisition of the planning dataset with the multiaxial robotic C-arm system Artis zeego. An indication-customized dose-reduced protocol for Artis zeego was developed and implemented into the workflow. A sample of 14 patients who had undergone intraoperative imaging with Artis zeego was analyzed. A sample of 10 patients with conventional preoperative imaging by cranial computed tomography (CT) was used as a control group. Outcomes were compared with regard to target deviation, diagnostic value of the biopsies, complications, and procedure time. In all patients, a suitable intraoperative planning dataset could be acquired with Artis zeego. Total procedure time was shorter for the Artis zeego group (p = 0.01), whereas time in the operating room area was longer in the Artis zeego group (p = 0.04). Biopsy results were diagnostic in 12 patients (86%) in the Artis zeego group and in 8 patients (80%) in the control group. There were no significant differences in target size, trajectory length, or target deviation. Intraoperative imaging for frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy with Artis zeego is an easy and feasible method. Accuracy is comparable to conventional CT, whereas radiation exposure could be additionally reduced. It allows a significant reduction of the total procedure length and improves the comfort for the patient and staff.

P.157 Frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: A retrospective review of diagnostic yield and complications at a Canadian Center

Background: Historically, frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy (SBB) has played an important role in the diagnosis of intracranial lesions. We performed a single centre analysis of the outcomes and efficacy of SBB at the London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of frame-based SBB from 2006 to 2017 at the LHSC. Intra-operative and final pathology reports were analyzed for biopsy diagnosis and the diagnosis was compared with pre-operative neuroimaging reports for correlation. SBB-associated morbidity and mortality were investigated using chart review and post-operative neuroimaging. Results: 173 consecutive patients were identified. The overall morbidity rate was 8.7% (15 cases) and mortality rate was 0.6% (1 case). Final biopsy diagnostic accuracy was 96%, intra-operative diagnostic accuracy was 94% and pre-operative imaging diagnostic accuracy was 65%. Elevated partial thromboplastin time and the presence of hemorrhage on post-operative CT were associated with neurological morbidity and mortality. The need to obtain three or greater samples the time of biopsy was associated with non-diagnostic biopsy. Conclusions: At the LHSC, SBB is a relatively safe and effective surgical procedure with high diagnostic yield and relatively low risk of complications. Intra-operative pathology has a high efficacy in determining diagnosis when compared to final pathology.

Comparison of Frame-Based Versus Frameless Image-Guided Intracranial Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A Retrospective Analysis of Safety and Efficacy

A definitive diagnosis of brain lesions not amenable to surgery is mainly made by stereotactic needle biopsy. The diagnostic yield and safety of the frameless versus frame-based image-guided stereotactic techniques is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and accuracy of frameless versus frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy techniques. A total of 278 patients (153 men; mean age: 65.5 years) with intra-axial brain lesions underwent frame-based (n= 148) or frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy (n= 130) using a minimally invasive twist drill technique during 2010-2016 at Sheba Medical Center. Demographic, imaging, and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic yield (>90%) did not differ significantly between groups. Overall morbidity (6.8% vs. 8.5%), incidence of permanent neurologic deficits (2.1% vs. 1.6%), mortality rate (0.7% vs. 0.8%), and postoperative computed tomography-detected asymptomatic (14.2% vs. 16.1%) and symptomatic (2.0% vs. 1.6%) bleeding also did not differ significantly between the frame-based and frameless cohorts, respectively. The diagnostic yield and complication rates related to the biopsy technique were not significantly associated with sex, age, entry angle to the skull and skull thickness, lesion location or depth, or radiologic characteristics. Diagnostic yield was significantly associated with the mean lesion volume. Smaller lesions were less diagnostic than larger lesions in both techniques (P= 0.043 frame-based and P= 0.048 frameless). The frameless biopsy technique is as efficient as the frame-based brain biopsy technique with a low complication rate. Lesion volume was the only predictive factor of diagnostic yield. The minimally invasive twist drill technique is safe and efficient.

Letter to the Editor Regarding “Hemorrhagic Attitude in Frameless and Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy for Deep-Seated Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas in Immunocompetent Patients: A Multicentric Analysis of the Last Twenty Years”

Preoperative venogram of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is helpful to plan the surgical resection strategy in patients with parasagittal meningiomas invading the SSS.Catheter 3-dimensional rotational venography (3D-RV) allows for SSS patency assessment and detection of alternative venous cortical drainage routes in patients with contraindication for magnet resonance venography. It is unknown if separate bilateral internal carotid artery 3D-RV followed by postprocessing 3D-3D fusion (technique 1) achieves the same imaging results as simultaneous bilateral internal carotid artery 3D-RV without postprocessing fusion (technique 2) needed.In this report we were able to confirm in 2 patients that both techniques achieve comparable imaging quality with similar amount of contrast use.Although technique 2 requires less radiation, technique 1 is favored due to the need for only 1 vessel access site and catheter with reduced risk for access site and ischemic complications.

In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding “Hemorrhagic Attitude in Frameless and Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy for Deep-Seated Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas in Immunocompetent Patients: A Multicentric Analysis of the Last Twenty Years”

In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding “Hemorrhagic Attitude in Frameless and Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy for Deep-Seated Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas in Immunocompetent Patients: A Multicentric Analysis of the Last Twenty Years”

Frame-based versus frameless stereotactic brain biopsies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Stereotactic brain biopsy techniques have been a focus of rapid technological innovation. The recent advent of frameless stereotaxy has invited the question of whether it can provide the same diagnostic yield as frame-based techniques, without increasing risk of harm to patients. The goal of this meta-analysis was to compare each of these techniques in terms of yield and safety.Methods: We independently searched four databases for English studies comparing frameless and frame-based stereotactic brain biopsies. Our primary outcome was biopsy diagnostic yield. Our secondary outcomes included mortality, morbidity (e.g., symptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, asymptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, new postbiopsy neurological deficit, and postbiopsy seizure), and frequency of repeat biopsy. We calculated pooled estimates and relative risks for dichotomous outcomes using Review Manager 5.3, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.Results: A total of 3256 stereotactic brain biopsies (2050 frame based and 1206 frameless), from 20 studies, were included in our final analysis. The results did not demonstrate any significant difference between the two stereotactic systems in terms of diagnostic yield (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.02, P = 0.64, I2 = 0%). The only significant difference was the increased frequency of asymptomatic hemorrhages in the frameless group (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06–1.75, P = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to the results yielded very low quality of all outcomes.Conclusion: Based on very low-quality evidence, both frame-based and frameless stereotaxy are safe and effective for biopsy of intracranial tumors. Further study of patient preference and cost comparing analysis is required to identify if either modality should be preferred.